Hi, everybody! The Pulchritude Award goes to words that don’t sound like what they actually mean. Today’s winner…
In the immortal words of the all-too-mortal Dr. Nick: “Inflammable means flammable? What a country!”
‘What a country,’ indeed, Dr. Nick. And what a word!
Or should I say ‘What a prefix?’
Or should I say ‘What a series of prefixes?’
Or should I just shut up?
You see, there are a couple of ‘in-’ prefixes, that come from a variety of Latin roots. Most obviously, ‘in-’ can mean ‘un-’ or ‘not,’ as in invisible, incredible, or inadequate.
But there’s also an ‘in-’ prefix that means ‘in,’ ‘into,’ or ’toward,’ as in income or inundate. This is also the prefix for inhibit, which comes from Latin roots that roughly mean ‘hold in.’ Therefore, uninhibited is not a double-negative. That’s also where inflammable comes from—an adjective that means something is liable to burst ‘INTO’ flame.
Now if someone could just explain why invaluable is better than valuable!
Past winners of the Pulchritude Award are:
Alacrity and Phlegmatic
LOL. Thanks for clarifying. 🙂
Indubitably!
Very interesting!
I guess invaluable means no value, so it’s a negative but in a postive way? xD Like.. Can’t put a price tag on it… I don’t know, it’s early, I need coffee.
Yeah, sort of like priceless! But then I noticed online that someone pointed out that ‘priceless’ is a good thing, but ‘worthless’ is not. Urgh! It is early, I need some Coke Zero.
Ahhh, how confusing!
Maybe Redbull would be more appropriate, eheh.
Who knew?